<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interaction + Visibility = winning combo for Graphics projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/</link>
	<description>oDesk - The Future of Work</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo design firm</title>
		<link>http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo design firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.odesk.com/?p=59#comment-17218</guid>
		<description>Abid, to restyle a logo is difficult for a logo mill like logoworks, just because they're used to look into their designs stock and provide firms looking for a new logo with drafts already created. When you have to restyle a logo, you actually have more restrictions -as you have to keep, update, delete and add features to the existing logo. The lack of interaction that you felt was actually the constraints of a system thought to "push" drafts instead of portraying corporate identities. If you surf the net looking for Arteis, you'll know how logoworks actually works and why you got disappointed by their proposals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abid, to restyle a logo is difficult for a logo mill like logoworks, just because they&#8217;re used to look into their designs stock and provide firms looking for a new logo with drafts already created. When you have to restyle a logo, you actually have more restrictions -as you have to keep, update, delete and add features to the existing logo. The lack of interaction that you felt was actually the constraints of a system thought to &#8220;push&#8221; drafts instead of portraying corporate identities. If you surf the net looking for Arteis, you&#8217;ll know how logoworks actually works and why you got disappointed by their proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abid</title>
		<link>http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Abid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.odesk.com/?p=59#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>John, thanks for the feedback. The current oDesk logo is on the top left of www.odesk.com

Constantine, we agree. The oDesk logo is going to remain the same. It has gone from the blue/green color to the blue/gray color:

Old:
https://team.odesk.com/img/oDeskLogo.png

New:
http://www.odesk.com/images/oDeskLogo.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, thanks for the feedback. The current oDesk logo is on the top left of <a href="http://www.odesk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.odesk.com</a></p>
<p>Constantine, we agree. The oDesk logo is going to remain the same. It has gone from the blue/green color to the blue/gray color:</p>
<p>Old:<br />
<a href="https://team.odesk.com/img/oDeskLogo.png" rel="nofollow">https://team.odesk.com/img/oDeskLogo.png</a></p>
<p>New:<br />
<a href="http://www.odesk.com/images/oDeskLogo.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.odesk.com/images/oDeskLogo.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine Karnacevych</title>
		<link>http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine Karnacevych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.odesk.com/?p=59#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>imho, the new logo is not necessary. first two lines are looking like dilettante usage of some public cliparts and with very dubious skill in some kind of drawing software i.e. CorelDraw or AdobeIllustrator, and the rest of them are clones from current oDesk logo.
sorry if I said rude things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imho, the new logo is not necessary. first two lines are looking like dilettante usage of some public cliparts and with very dubious skill in some kind of drawing software i.e. CorelDraw or AdobeIllustrator, and the rest of them are clones from current oDesk logo.<br />
sorry if I said rude things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Addington</title>
		<link>http://www.odesk.com/blog/2006/08/interaction-visibility-winning-combo-for-graphics-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>John Addington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.odesk.com/?p=59#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>I'm new, so I do not remember seeing oDesk logo.

So for feedback, I am letting you know I was immediately drawn to the one on row 2, column 4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new, so I do not remember seeing oDesk logo.</p>
<p>So for feedback, I am letting you know I was immediately drawn to the one on row 2, column 4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
